« Back to Blog

What is Relevant About the New Tax Law? Part 5: STATE & LOCAL TAXES, MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES

Posted August 24, 2018

One of the biggest changes resulting from the new tax law signed in December 2017 is a severe limit imposed by the Republican-controlled Congress on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Under the previous law, these deductions were unlimited for individuals and families. The limit now is set at $10,000 per tax return. For example, Fred is single and owes $6,000 for state income tax and $6,000 for local property tax. For 2017 he was entitled to deduct $12,000, but for 2018 his deduction is limited to $10,000.

This change will hit taxpayers hardest in the six states where SALT deductions, as a percentage of income, are highest: New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, California, Maryland, and Oregon. Because these are states that lean heavily blue, and this new tax law is Republican legislation with almost no support from Democrats, it is easy to argue that this is not a coincidence — i.e. that “Red State” Republicans found a way to punish “Blue State” Democrats.

The new limit on SALT deductions will harm married couples who file jointly more than it harms singles, as the $10,000 limit is per tax return and not per person. Married couples can file separate returns, but according to the new tax law, each spouse would only qualify for $5,000 in state and local tax deductions. To qualify for two $10,000 deductions, the couple would have to divorce.

Miscellaneous Expenses

Beyond the broad-reaching limit on SALT deductions, which will affect taxpayers across various income brackets even outside those six states, Congress also eliminated deductions for miscellaneous expenses often incurred by high-income taxpayers. Those eliminated include unreimbursed employee expenses for travel, meals, and entertainment; union dues; subscriptions; safe deposit box fees; tax preparation fees; and investment advisory fees. Qualifying for the miscellaneous expense deductions was never easy for most taxpayers because total eligible expenses had to exceed 2% of income. However, the elimination of the miscellaneous expense deduction does hurt many taxpayers with high professional fee expenses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for our monthly Bell e-News.

To get the latest news and updates from us, please fill out the form and click "Subscribe" to receive our e-newsletter.

Market Analysis

White paper feature image
The U.S. Consumer Lifts Once-Maligned Retailers
September 12, 2018

Brian Cornell, age 60, Target CEO, asserts that we are in the best consumer environment that he has ...


bellinvest publicaion
Homeowners Insurance
July 23, 2018

On October 8, 2017, a fire began in Calistoga, California, that would kill 43 people and displace 10...

Latest News

John Emerson Addresses Bell Investment Committee

The Bell Investment Advisors Investment Committee had the great privilege on July 11, 2018 to be visited by the distinguished John B. Emerson, American diplomat, lawyer, and former U.S. Ambassador to Germany, who was appointed by President Obama to serve on his Advisory Committee for Trade Policy and Negotiations. He currently works in global distribution […]

Latest Tweet

Connect With Us

bellinvest 20 year